Weather

65°F1:27 AM

Politics

1 read

White House Issues Warning on Insider Trading Amid Prediction Market Concerns

KVIA•Friday, April 10, 2026 at 5:34 PM•CNN Newsource

Government building representing politics and policy news

Want the full story?

Read the complete article at KVIA

AI Summary

The White House has issued a memo to staff cautioning against insider trading on prediction markets, particularly in light of recent trades related to the Iran conflict. Although there is no evidence linking officials to these trades, the memo highlights the serious legal implications of using nonpublic information for financial gain. The warning comes as lawmakers propose new regulations to prevent insider trading among government employees. Prediction platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket have faced scrutiny for their handling of sensitive information, prompting calls for stricter oversight. The memo reiterates the administration's commitment to ethical conduct among its employees.

Key Details: • White House memo warns against insider trading using nonpublic information. • Kalshi and Polymarket are the main prediction sites mentioned. • Lawmakers are proposing over a dozen bills to regulate prediction markets. • Misuse of nonpublic information is a criminal offense under federal law.

ethics regulation white-house insider-trading prediction-markets

People & Organizations

White HouseCommodity Futures Trading Commission

Related Articles

South Carolina Senate Halts GOP Redistricting Efforts Ahead of Midterms

In a significant political move, South Carolina state senators voted against advancing a proposed congressional map, effectively stalling the Republican Party's redistricting efforts. This decision comes as the nation gears up for the upcoming midterm elections, highlighting the contentious nature of electoral map changes. The failure to pass the redistricting plan could impact the GOP's strategy in the state, potentially affecting congressional representation. This development is crucial for political observers and constituents as it may influence voter dynamics leading into the elections.

Justice Department Seeks Interviews with 2020 Election Workers in Georgia

The Justice Department is pursuing interviews with poll workers and ballot counters from the 2020 election in Fulton County, Georgia, as part of an investigation into election integrity. This move, revealed during a court hearing, aims to gather insights from those who directly handled ballots. Fulton County's elections office has opposed the subpoena for workers' information, claiming it could discourage civic engagement and lead to harassment of individuals associated with the election. The case raises concerns about the potential reopening of unfounded fraud theories despite Joe Biden's significant victory in the county. The judge has yet to decide on the Justice Department's request, which could have implications for future elections.

Tensions Rise as Iran Challenges U.S. Ceasefire Amid Ongoing Conflicts

Recent escalations between the U.S. and Iran have raised concerns about the stability of a ceasefire that was supposed to be in effect. Iran accused the U.S. of violating the ceasefire with attacks on missile launch platforms and vessels, while the U.S. maintained that the ceasefire was still in place. This ongoing conflict highlights the Trump administration's struggle to balance military actions with diplomatic efforts, as Iran continues to assert its military presence in the Strait of Hormuz. The situation is critical as it may affect future negotiations and the potential for renewed hostilities, with the U.S. seemingly eager to avoid a full-scale war despite provocations from Iran.

Critics of Trump Consider Seeking Compensation from Controversial DOJ Fund

Former federal officials, including ex-prosecutors and journalists, are contemplating claims against a $1.8 billion fund established by the Department of Justice (DOJ) to address perceived political misuse of justice by the Trump administration. Some have already submitted letters detailing their grievances, while others debate the legitimacy of the fund itself. Notably, six Democratic lawmakers who faced legal scrutiny for urging military disobedience are also considering claims. The fund was created as part of a settlement related to Trump's lawsuit against the IRS, and its impartiality is under scrutiny. Critics argue that Trump and his allies are not victims but rather the perpetrators of political weaponization, as many former DOJ officials feel they were politically targeted during Trump's presidency.