Weather

65°F2:58 AM

Politics

1 read

Trump's Extreme Proposals Gain Unexpected Support Among Republicans

KVIA•Saturday, April 18, 2026 at 11:35 AM•CNN Newsource

Government building representing politics and policy news

Want the full story?

Read the complete article at KVIA

AI Summary

Recent surveys reveal a significant portion of the Republican base supports extreme proposals put forth by former President Donald Trump, including military actions against Iran and threats of civilizational destruction. A Quinnipiac University poll indicated that 66% of Republicans favor bombing Iranian infrastructure if negotiations fail, contrasting sharply with the overwhelming disapproval from Democrats and independents. Trump's rhetoric has consistently pushed boundaries, with many Republicans showing willingness to endorse ideas that could be considered illegal or war crimes. This trend highlights a growing acceptance among his supporters for increasingly aggressive military policies, raising concerns about the implications for U.S. foreign relations and domestic politics.

Key Details: • 66% of Republicans support bombing Iranian infrastructure if negotiations fail. • 62% of Republicans found Trump's threat to 'end a civilization' acceptable. • 74% of Republicans viewed Trump's joke about wanting to be a dictator positively. • 58% of Republicans support military action against drug cartels in Mexico without government consent.

military trump republicans foreign-policy polls

People & Organizations

Donald TrumpCBS NewsMexicoIranQuinnipiac UniversityReuters-Ipsos

Related Articles

Federal Judge Blocks Trump's Anti-Weaponization Fund Amid Legal Challenges

A federal judge in Virginia has issued a temporary injunction against the Trump administration's proposed $1.8 billion Anti-Weaponization Fund, which aimed to compensate individuals deemed wrongly targeted by the government. Judge Leonie Brinkema's order prevents any actions related to the fund, including transferring or disbursing money. A hearing is scheduled for June 12 to discuss a potential longer-term halt to the fund's establishment, following objections from various groups claiming they would be excluded from receiving funds. This development is significant as it could impact the administration's ability to implement this controversial financial initiative.

Iran's Threats of Total Ruin Highlight Risks of Diplomatic Failure

As negotiations between the U.S. and Iran progress towards a tentative agreement, Iranian officials warn that a return to conflict would be significantly different from past wars. The U.S. has conducted multiple strikes against Iran, and Iranian military leaders assert they have options to escalate if diplomacy fails. Key threats include potential disruptions to vital maritime routes like the Strait of Hormuz and Bab al-Mandeb, which could severely impact global oil trade and drive up prices. Experts caution that a simultaneous crisis in these regions would have dire economic consequences worldwide. Residents should stay informed about the evolving situation as it could affect global energy prices and security.

Federal Judge Blocks Trump’s Controversial Anti-Weaponization Fund Plans

A federal judge in Virginia has issued a temporary injunction against the Trump administration's proposed Anti-Weaponization Fund, which is intended to allocate nearly $1.8 billion to compensate individuals allegedly wronged by the government. Judge Leonie Brinkema's order prohibits any actions related to the fund, including transferring money, processing claims, or distributing funds. A hearing is scheduled for June 12 to discuss the possibility of a more permanent halt to the fund's establishment, following challenges from various groups claiming ineligibility for compensation. This ruling could have significant implications for the administration's plans and the individuals affected.

Chicago's Federal Prosecutor Dismisses Investigation Claims Against E. Jean Carroll

The U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois has refuted claims that his office is conducting a criminal investigation into E. Jean Carroll, who is known for her allegations of sexual assault against former President Donald Trump. Carroll gained significant attention after winning substantial damages in her lawsuits against Trump. The denial comes amid ongoing discussions about the implications of her case and the legal landscape surrounding allegations of this nature. This clarification is important for those following the legal proceedings related to high-profile figures and their accountability.