Weather

86°F3:14 PM

Politics

1 read

Spain Launches New Investigation into Ex-President Zapatero Over Unaccounted Jewelry

KVIA•Friday, June 12, 2026 at 9:46 PM•CNN Newsource

Government building representing politics and policy news

Want the full story?

Read the complete article at KVIA

AI Summary

The National Court of Spain has initiated a new investigation into former Spanish President José Luís Rodríguez Zapatero concerning potential tax offenses and smuggling related to jewelry valued at over $1.5 million found during a police raid on May 19. This operation is part of a broader inquiry known as the 'Plus Ultra' case, which examines allegations of influence peddling and money laundering linked to a $61.75 million government bailout for the airline. Zapatero has publicly denied any wrongdoing, asserting that his actions have always complied with the law. The judge noted that the jewelry's unverified origins could indicate significant tax evasion, potentially leading to criminal charges if the unpaid taxes exceed $138,800. Zapatero is scheduled to testify regarding both the jewelry case and the 'Plus Ultra' investigation on June 17 and 18.

Key Details: • Jewelry valued at over $1.5 million found during a police raid. • Zapatero scheduled to testify on June 17 and 18 regarding the investigations. • Potential tax evasion charges if unpaid taxes exceed $138,800.

politics investigation corruption jewelry tax-evasion

People & Organizations

Policía NacionalMadridJosé Luís Rodríguez ZapateroJosé Luis CalamaVíctor MorenoNational Court of Spain

Related Articles

Trump Administration Ties Federal Security Funds to Election Reforms

The Trump administration is threatening to withhold over $1 billion in federal security funds unless states implement extensive electoral reforms. These reforms include phasing out electronic voting systems in favor of hand-marked paper ballots and verifying voter rolls against a controversial Department of Homeland Security database. If states refuse to comply, they could lose up to 20% of their grant funding, significantly impacting state budgets. This move is seen as part of a broader strategy by the Trump administration to influence state election processes, which may face legal challenges due to constitutional limitations on federal authority over state elections.

Iran May Permit Nuclear Inspectors Amid Ongoing Discussions

In a significant development regarding international nuclear oversight, Iran is reportedly considering allowing nuclear inspectors into the country. While this move could indicate a willingness to engage more transparently with global powers, Iran has yet to officially confirm this arrangement. The implications of such a decision are substantial, as it could affect diplomatic relations and negotiations surrounding Iran's nuclear program. Stakeholders in the international community are closely monitoring this situation to assess the potential impact on regional stability and nuclear non-proliferation efforts.

Major Job Cuts Begin at National Intelligence Office Amid Controversy

The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) has commenced significant layoffs under the leadership of acting director William Pulte, appointed by President Trump. Reports indicate that hundreds of positions may be eliminated, particularly affecting the National Counterterrorism Center and the National Counterintelligence and Security Center. This move has raised concerns among top Democrats, who warn that such drastic cuts could jeopardize national security, especially following previous downsizing efforts. Lawmakers have urged Pulte to reconsider the scale of these layoffs, emphasizing the importance of the ODNI's mission established post-9/11. The situation remains fluid as Pulte's tenure and intentions are scrutinized.

Federal Judge Blocks Trump's Use of Social Security Data for Voter Lists

A federal judge has ruled that the Trump administration violated privacy protections by modifying the SAVE program, which was intended to verify citizenship for voter registration. Judge Sparkle Sooknanan's decision halts the use of expanded data, including Social Security information, for purging voter rolls. This ruling is significant as it addresses concerns that citizens could be wrongfully removed from voter lists, impacting their voting rights. The case, brought by voting rights organizations, highlights the ongoing legal battles over voter verification practices and the potential misuse of personal data. The Department of Justice's push to access unredacted voter registration records may also be affected by this ruling.