Weather

86°F8:47 PM

Politics

1 read

New Trump Administration Rule Forces Green Card Applicants to Leave U.S.

KVIA•Friday, May 22, 2026 at 10:06 PM•CNN Newsource

Government building representing politics and policy news

Want the full story?

Read the complete article at KVIA

AI Summary

The Trump administration has implemented a new requirement for individuals seeking a green card, mandating that they exit the United States during the application process. This policy change could significantly impact hundreds of thousands of immigrants, disrupting families and communities as applicants are forced to leave their jobs and lives behind. The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services announced that while there may be exemptions for extraordinary circumstances, this rule is expected to face legal challenges due to its harsh implications. Critics, including lawmakers and immigration advocates, argue that this move will deter talented individuals from contributing to the U.S. economy and innovation.

Key Details: • Applicants must return to their home countries to apply for permanent visas. • The policy could affect approximately 1.4 million people who obtained legal permanent residency in FY 2024. • Exemptions for extraordinary circumstances may be available, but details are unclear. • Legal challenges to this new rule are anticipated from various advocacy groups.

immigration trump policy-change legal-challenges green-card

People & Organizations

Donald TrumpCato InstituteU.S. Citizenship and Immigration ServicesDavid J. BierDelia C. RamirezGreg Stanton

Related Articles

Trump Engages More with Reporters than Biden, Say NYT Journalists

In a recent commentary, New York Times reporters Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan highlighted that President Donald Trump is more forthcoming with the press compared to former President Joe Biden. This observation underscores the differing communication styles of the two leaders and raises questions about transparency and media engagement in politics. The remarks were made during a discussion on the current state of political reporting and public interaction with elected officials. This comparison may influence public perception regarding accountability and accessibility of political figures.

Chief Justice Roberts Reverses 1935 Precedent on Presidential Firing Powers

Chief Justice John Roberts has successfully led a majority of the Supreme Court to overturn a longstanding 1935 ruling that limited the president's authority to dismiss heads of independent agencies. This decision, which reflects Roberts' long-held belief in a more powerful presidency, allows for greater executive control over agencies like the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). The ruling is significant as it impacts regulatory oversight in areas such as public health and consumer protection, potentially altering the balance of power between Congress and the presidency. Justice Sonia Sotomayor dissented, warning that this move elevates presidential power beyond constitutional norms. The ruling underscores the ongoing ideological battle within the court, particularly with the current conservative supermajority.

Chief Justice Roberts Reshapes Presidential Power Over Independent Agencies

Chief Justice John Roberts has successfully led a movement to enhance presidential authority by reversing a 1935 Supreme Court precedent that limited a president's ability to fire heads of independent agencies. This ruling, which he articulated during a recent court session, emphasizes the president's responsibility to oversee federal agencies without congressional restrictions. The decision impacts various regulatory bodies, including the Federal Trade Commission, which plays a crucial role in consumer protection. Critics, including Justice Sonia Sotomayor, argue that this shift undermines the independence of regulatory agencies and could lead to potential abuses of power. The ruling reflects Roberts' long-standing vision for a more powerful executive branch, which has evolved over his tenure on the court.

Supreme Court Ruling Reshapes Presidential Authority Over Federal Agencies

The U.S. Supreme Court delivered a significant ruling that allows the president to dismiss leaders of independent federal agencies without cause, overturning a precedent established in 1935. This decision could change how the federal government operates and strengthens the executive branch's control. However, the court also ruled against Trump regarding Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, preventing her dismissal based on controversial allegations. Additionally, the court upheld the counting of mail-in ballots received after Election Day, amid ongoing debates over voting regulations. These rulings reflect ongoing tensions between presidential power and established legal protections for federal officials.