Weather

93°F4:07 PM

Politics

1 read

New Settlement Shields Trump and Family from IRS Tax Investigations

KVIA•Tuesday, May 19, 2026 at 9:10 PM•CNN Newsource

Government building representing politics and policy news

Want the full story?

Read the complete article at KVIA

AI Summary

A recent settlement between the Justice Department and former President Donald Trump includes terms that prevent the IRS from pursuing any claims against Trump, his family, or associated businesses regarding past tax issues. This agreement, which is part of a larger $10 billion lawsuit settlement, also establishes a $1.8 billion fund aimed at compensating individuals and organizations allegedly harmed by previous administrations. Critics, including Rep. Richard Neal, have condemned the added terms as a form of corruption, arguing that they effectively turn the federal government into a protective entity for Trump. The settlement does not, however, obstruct potential audits concerning tax returns filed after the agreement's date.

Key Details: • Settlement includes a $1.8 billion fund for alleged victims of past administrations. • IRS is permanently barred from investigating Trump's past tax returns. • Critics label the agreement as corruption and self-dealing. • The agreement does not prevent audits on tax returns filed after the settlement date.

trump justice-department settlement corruption irs

People & Organizations

Donald TrumpJustice DepartmentTodd BlancheIRSRichard Neal

Related Articles

New Legislation Aims to Support Military Spouses and Child Care Services

Congresswoman Veronica Escobar has proposed the Military Spouse Employment and Child Care Readiness Act to enhance job prospects for military spouses and improve child care services for military families. This legislation seeks to direct the Department of Defense to explore strategies for bolstering the military child care workforce, addressing the challenges faced by families who frequently move due to military assignments. By creating more employment opportunities for spouses, the act aims to provide stability and support to military families, which is crucial given their unique circumstances.

El Paso's Trash Fee Dispute Faces Setback as Appeals Court Denies Rehearing

The Eighth Court of Appeals has rejected El Paso's request for a rehearing regarding the environmental franchise fee dispute involving former State Representative Joe Pickett. This decision marks a significant development in the ongoing legal battle, which has implications for the city's revenue and environmental initiatives. The court's order, signed on July 20, 2026, emphasizes the complexity of the case and the city's efforts to uphold its fee structure. Residents and stakeholders should stay informed as this situation evolves, as it may affect local environmental funding and services.

Ukraine's Military Leadership Change Reflects Generational Shift Amid Protests

In a significant move, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky replaced 60-year-old Oleksandr Syrskyi with 43-year-old Mykhailo Drapatyi as the military chief, prompted by a week of protests following the dismissal of popular Defense Minister Mykhailo Fedorov. This leadership change signals a generational shift in Ukraine’s military strategy, moving away from traditional tactics to a more modern approach utilizing technology and automation. The protests highlighted the political tensions surrounding military decisions and the need for reform in the face of ongoing challenges, including manpower shortages and infrastructure issues. The new commander, Drapatyi, is recognized for his previous successes and innovative strategies, suggesting a potential turning point for Ukraine's war efforts.

Trump's Nuclear Deal with Saudi Arabia Sparks Controversy Over Enrichment Capabilities

President Donald Trump has approved a 30-year nuclear agreement with Saudi Arabia that may allow the kingdom to enrich its own fuel for civilian reactors. This deal, which could be announced as early as Wednesday, involves U.S. companies providing technology and expertise to support Saudi Arabia's nuclear program. The agreement has raised concerns due to its potential to enable Saudi Arabia to develop nuclear weapons, especially amid tensions with regional rivals like Iran. Additionally, the deal includes restrictions on inspections of the Saudi program, prompting skepticism from U.S. lawmakers. The implications of this agreement are significant, as it could alter the balance of power in the Middle East and affect U.S. foreign relations.