Skip to main content
915 TLDR
Politics
1 read

New Immigration Policy Forces Green Card Applicants to Leave the U.S.

KVIA••ABC News
Government building representing politics and policy news

Want the full story?

Read the complete article at KVIA

Read Original

AI Summary

A recent directive from the Trump administration mandates that most temporary visa holders and humanitarian parolees must return to their home countries to file for green cards, reversing previous practices that allowed for in-country applications. This policy, described as a part of an immigration crackdown, affects a significant number of individuals, including those from war-torn regions like Afghanistan and Ukraine. Immigration experts argue that this change could lead to family separations and hinder U.S. companies from retaining skilled workers. Legal challenges are anticipated as many view the directive as an unlawful alteration of long-standing immigration laws.

Key Details: • Temporary visa holders must apply for green cards from their home countries. • The policy is expected to impact hundreds of thousands of applicants. • Legal challenges to the directive are likely due to its perceived illegality.

immigration trump-administration humanitarian visa green-card

People & Organizations

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration ServicesAmerican Immigration Lawyers AssociationZach KahlerRosanna BerardiTodd PomerleauShev Dalal-Dheini

Related Articles

KVIA•Jun 17

New US-Iran Agreement Promises Ceasefire and Economic Aid

A newly obtained 14-point memorandum outlines a ceasefire agreement between the United States and Iran, emphasizing the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz and financial assistance for Iran. The deal, set to be formally signed on Friday, includes provisions for Iran to sell oil and access a $300 billion development fund, contingent on compliance with nuclear commitments. While the US downplays the significance of the document, the agreement marks a pivotal moment in US-Iran relations, with a 60-day timeline for final negotiations. The memorandum also stresses mutual respect for sovereignty and a commitment to non-hostility.

Politics
1 min read
KTSM•Jun 17

Georgia Primaries Highlight Challenges for Trump and His Candidates

In a recent primary election in Georgia, President Trump's influence faced significant setbacks as several candidates he endorsed did not secure victories. This outcome is crucial as it reflects the shifting dynamics within the Republican Party and raises questions about Trump's continued dominance in upcoming elections. Key races highlighted the challenges for Trump's preferred candidates, indicating potential vulnerabilities ahead of the general election. Voter sentiment appears to be evolving, making it essential for local and national Republican leaders to reassess their strategies moving forward.

Politics
1 min read
KVIA•Jun 17

Trump's Endorsement Leads to Collins' Victory in Georgia Senate Race

In a significant Republican primary runoff in Georgia, Rep. Mike Collins, backed by former President Donald Trump, triumphed over former football coach Derek Dooley, who was supported by Governor Brian Kemp. This victory positions Collins against Democratic Senator Jon Ossoff in a highly anticipated midterm election, where Ossoff currently boasts a substantial $32 million campaign fund advantage. Meanwhile, in the governor's race, Rick Jackson, a self-funding businessman, defeated both Trump and Kemp's favored candidates, marking a surprising turn in the political landscape. The outcomes highlight the ongoing rivalry between Trump and Kemp, as well as the shifting dynamics within the Republican Party as they prepare for the November elections.

Politics
1 min read
KVIA•Jun 17

U.S. Officials Downplay Iran Deal Text Amid Ongoing Negotiations

U.S. negotiators are working to quickly release the text of an agreement with Iran, which they describe as vague and primarily aimed at facilitating future technical discussions. Officials state that the one-and-a-half-page memorandum does not fully reflect key commitments made by Iran through private channels, which gives the U.S. confidence in the deal. The agreement outlines potential sanctions relief and economic benefits for Iran, including access to a $300 billion development fund, contingent on Iran's compliance with nuclear commitments. However, the specifics regarding the timeline for asset unfreezing and nuclear material destruction remain unclear, leading to criticism from conservative factions in the U.S. who demand transparency about the agreement's content.

Politics
1 min read