Weather

88°F3:45 PM

Politics

1 read

Minnesota and Illinois Challenge Federal Immigration Tactics Using 10th Amendment

KVIA•Wednesday, January 14, 2026 at 5:50 PM•CNN Newsource

Government building representing politics and policy news

Want the full story?

Read the complete article at KVIA

AI Summary

Minnesota and Illinois have filed lawsuits against the Trump administration, claiming that the surge of federal immigration agents violates the 10th Amendment and infringes on state sovereignty. Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison argues that the presence of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Border Patrol agents disrupts local governance and public safety. Illinois Governor JB Pritzker contends that the federal tactics are unlawful and abusive. Both states aim to protect their residents from what they describe as federal overreach, seeking judicial intervention to limit ICE's enforcement capabilities. This legal battle highlights the ongoing tension between state rights and federal immigration policies.

Key Details: • Minnesota and Illinois filed lawsuits on the same day, challenging federal immigration enforcement. • The lawsuits cite the 10th Amendment, arguing it protects state sovereignty. • Both states are asking courts to block ICE from enforcing certain immigration laws. • Chicago, Minneapolis, and Saint Paul are also plaintiffs in the lawsuits.

immigration lawsuit 10th-amendment state-sovereignty federal-overreach

People & Organizations

Immigration and Customs EnforcementDepartment of Homeland SecurityDonald TrumpMinneapolisChicagoIllinoisMinnesotaJB PritzkerKeith EllisonSaint Paul

Related Articles

Bangladesh's First Post-Revolution Election: Old Guard vs. New Hope

Bangladesh is set to hold its first election since the 2024 uprising that ousted long-time leader Sheikh Hasina, who fled the country amid widespread protests. While many young activists celebrated the end of Hasina's 15-year rule marked by accusations of corruption and violence, the leading candidates are from the political establishment, raising concerns among the youth. The Bangladesh Nationalist Party, led by Tarique Rahman, and the Islamist Jamaat-e-Islami are poised to regain power, while the newly formed National Citizen Party struggles to gain traction. This election is seen as a crucial moment for the country's future, with hopes for genuine reform and inclusivity amidst fears of political violence.

Federal Judge Halts California's Mask Ban for Law Enforcement Officers

A federal judge in California has issued a temporary injunction against the state's law prohibiting most law enforcement officers from wearing masks during operations. The ruling, granted by US District Judge Christina Snyder, supports the Trump administration's claim that the ban unfairly discriminates against federal agents. While the mask ban is blocked, a requirement for federal officers to display their name or badge number remains in effect. This law, which was enacted in response to aggressive immigration raids, aims to enhance transparency and accountability among law enforcement. California officials argue that the legislation is crucial for public safety and civil liberties.

U.S. Military Strikes Drug Vessel in Pacific, Leaving Two Dead and One Survivor

On February 9, U.S. Southern Command executed a lethal strike against a suspected drug trafficking vessel in the eastern Pacific, resulting in two fatalities and one survivor. This operation is part of the ongoing Southern Spear campaign aimed at combating drug trafficking, which has seen at least 121 deaths since its inception. The U.S. government has classified the deceased as 'illegal combatants' and claims the authority to conduct such strikes without judicial review, a stance that has faced significant scrutiny in Congress. The legality of these operations, particularly the first strike in September 2025, remains controversial, with military lawyers questioning their compliance with legal standards.

Senate Democrats Face Tough Choice on DHS Funding Before Deadline

Senate Democrats are confronted with a challenging vote regarding a temporary funding measure for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) as the Friday deadline approaches. Despite efforts to reach a long-term funding agreement, negotiations remain stalled, creating uncertainty for government operations. This decision is crucial as it impacts national security and immigration enforcement, affecting both local and national stakeholders. The outcome of this vote will determine whether DHS can continue its operations without interruption.