Weather

66°F10:04 AM

Politics

1 read

Meet the Candidates for El Paso's 171st District Court Judge Election

El Paso Matters•Monday, February 9, 2026 at 9:24 PM•El Paso Matters Staff

Government building representing politics and policy news

Want the full story?

Read the complete article at El Paso Matters

AI Summary

The upcoming Democratic primary on March 3 will determine the nominee for the 171st District Court judge in El Paso, a position that oversees significant felony cases and civil matters. Candidates Alex Cuellar, an attorney and EPISD board member, and Amanda Enriquez, a senior division chief at the District Attorney’s Office, are vying for the role. Cuellar emphasizes integrity and daily court presence, while Enriquez focuses on effective docket management and fairness. Both candidates bring extensive legal experience, with Cuellar having tried nearly 100 cases and Enriquez around 80 jury trials. This election is crucial for shaping the judicial landscape in El Paso.

Key Details: • Democratic primary election date: March 3 • Alex Cuellar's experience includes overseeing a $600 million budget and managing 48,000 students as an EPISD trustee. • Amanda Enriquez has handled serious criminal cases and emphasizes fairness in court proceedings. • Judges serve four-year terms with a starting salary of $193,000.

democratic-primary election candidates judicial district-court

People & Organizations

El PasoEl Paso ISDAlex CuellarAmanda EnriquezDistrict Attorney’s Office

Related Articles

El Paso City Council Engages Consultant for Villegas' Ongoing Lawsuit

The El Paso City Council has decided to hire an external consultant to manage the ongoing civil lawsuit filed by Daniel Villegas, who was wrongfully convicted of a double murder in 1995. The council's unanimous vote, made during an executive session, comes as Villegas claims that the El Paso Police Department's mishandling of juvenile suspects led to his coerced confession. Although two of his claims were dismissed, the court will allow the third claim regarding police misconduct to proceed. This case has significant implications for police practices concerning juveniles. The next court date for Villegas is scheduled for August 20, 2023.

Swalwell and Gonzales Resign from Congress Amid Expulsion Threats

Representatives Eric Swalwell and Tony Gonzales announced their resignations from Congress just before a potential expulsion vote could take place. Both lawmakers faced significant pressure from colleagues in light of serious allegations, including sexual misconduct for Swalwell and an extramarital affair for Gonzales. Swalwell's resignation follows accusations of sexual assault and inappropriate behavior, while Gonzales's resignation comes amid an investigation into his conduct. Their departures prevent a complex and potentially embarrassing expulsion process for both parties, as leaders sought to avoid setting a concerning precedent in Congress. The resignations were effective immediately, with Swalwell's taking effect after he expressed regret over past mistakes.

Historians Challenge Trump Administration Over Presidential Records Preservation

Historians are suing the Trump administration, claiming that the National Archives has refused to guarantee the preservation of presidential records during ongoing litigation. This lawsuit follows a controversial Justice Department memo declaring the Presidential Records Act unconstitutional, which has raised concerns about the potential destruction of important documents. The American Historical Association, along with American Oversight, is seeking a court order to prevent the destruction of records essential for research. They argue that without intervention, vital historical documents could be irretrievably lost. The case highlights the ongoing legal battle over document retention and transparency in presidential administrations.

Justice Department Seeks to Overturn Seditious Conspiracy Convictions of Extremist Groups

The Justice Department has initiated a move to dismiss the seditious conspiracy convictions of members from the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers, a significant decision that could reverse notable achievements in the Biden administration's response to the January 6 Capitol riot. If approved by a judge, this action would eliminate serious charges from one of the largest federal investigations in U.S. history, which has already led to over 1,270 convictions. This development has sparked criticism from former officials, who argue it undermines the severity of the attack on democracy. The defendants include prominent leaders from both groups, and their legal representatives have expressed gratitude for the DOJ's decision, framing it as a positive step for political discourse surrounding protests that escalate into violence.