Weather

93°F8:52 PM

Politics

1 read

IRS Forbidden from Investigating Trump and Family's Past Tax Issues

KVIA•Tuesday, May 19, 2026 at 11:38 PM•CNN Newsource

Government building representing politics and policy news

Want the full story?

Read the complete article at KVIA

AI Summary

A recent agreement between the Department of Justice and former President Donald Trump prevents the IRS from pursuing any claims related to Trump's past tax issues. This extraordinary clause was quietly added to a $10 billion lawsuit settlement, which also establishes a fund of nearly $1.8 billion to compensate individuals allegedly targeted by previous administrations. Critics argue this arrangement benefits Trump and his family directly, effectively shielding them from future IRS scrutiny regarding tax filings prior to the agreement. The implications of this decision raise concerns about government accountability and the use of federal resources for personal legal protection.

Key Details: • The agreement prohibits the IRS from investigating Trump's past tax filings indefinitely. • A fund of approximately $1.8 billion has been created to compensate individuals affected by previous administrations. • Critics, including Representative Richard Neal, have condemned the agreement as a form of corruption.

trump taxes justice-department corruption irs

People & Organizations

Donald TrumpDepartment of JusticeTodd BlancheIRSRichard Neal

Related Articles

New Legislation Aims to Support Military Spouses and Child Care Services

Congresswoman Veronica Escobar has proposed the Military Spouse Employment and Child Care Readiness Act to enhance job prospects for military spouses and improve child care services for military families. This legislation seeks to direct the Department of Defense to explore strategies for bolstering the military child care workforce, addressing the challenges faced by families who frequently move due to military assignments. By creating more employment opportunities for spouses, the act aims to provide stability and support to military families, which is crucial given their unique circumstances.

Ucrania nombra a un nuevo comandante militar tras protestas públicas

El presidente ucraniano Volodymyr Zelensky ha designado a Mykhailo Drapatyi, de 43 años, como nuevo comandante supremo, reemplazando a Oleksandr Syrskyi, de 60 años. Esta decisión se produce tras una semana de protestas que reflejan el descontento con la estrategia militar de Syrskyi, quien fue criticado por la alta cantidad de bajas en el ejército ucraniano. Drapatyi, un general más joven con experiencia en el frente, representa un cambio generacional en el liderazgo militar, alineándose mejor con las necesidades actuales del conflicto, que requieren innovación tecnológica y tácticas más modernas. La transición también destaca la creciente presión sobre Zelensky para adaptarse a un entorno de guerra en constante evolución.

Trump Administration Seeks Immunity for Venezuelan Leader Delcy Rodríguez in Court Case

The Trump administration has requested a U.S. court to dismiss civil charges against Delcy Rodríguez, the acting president of Venezuela, citing her immunity as a head of state. This request was made following a letter from the Department of State, which recognized Rodríguez's status since March after the capture of Nicolás Maduro. The Department of Justice filed this suggestion for immunity in a Florida court to avoid significant foreign policy implications. The civil lawsuit, initiated by three American plaintiffs who were detained in Venezuela, also targets Maduro and other officials for alleged human rights violations. A federal judge recently ordered $314 million in damages, but excluded Rodríguez from this ruling.

El Paso's Trash Fee Dispute Faces Setback as Appeals Court Denies Rehearing

The Eighth Court of Appeals has rejected El Paso's request for a rehearing regarding the environmental franchise fee dispute involving former State Representative Joe Pickett. This decision marks a significant development in the ongoing legal battle, which has implications for the city's revenue and environmental initiatives. The court's order, signed on July 20, 2026, emphasizes the complexity of the case and the city's efforts to uphold its fee structure. Residents and stakeholders should stay informed as this situation evolves, as it may affect local environmental funding and services.