Weather

65°F2:58 AM

Politics

1 read

Governor Newsom Expresses Regret Over 'Apartheid' Comment on Israel

KVIA•Tuesday, March 24, 2026 at 5:31 PM•CNN Newsource

Government building representing politics and policy news

Want the full story?

Read the complete article at KVIA

AI Summary

California Governor Gavin Newsom has expressed regret for using the term 'apartheid' to describe Israel's treatment of Palestinians during a recent interview. His comments, made earlier this month, drew attention as he discussed the potential implications of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's policies. Newsom emphasized that while he opposes Netanyahu's leadership and the far-right direction of Israeli politics, he supports the state of Israel. This statement reflects a growing division within the Democratic Party regarding Israel, especially in light of recent military operations in Gaza. Newsom's remarks underscore the complex dynamics of U.S.-Israel relations and the potential for escalating rhetoric around the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Key Details: • Newsom's comments were made during a live appearance on 'Pod Save America'. • He stated his regret specifically in the context of Netanyahu's policies. • The discussion highlights a shift in perspectives within the Democratic Party regarding Israel.

politics israel gavin-newsom democratic-party palestinians

People & Organizations

Benjamin NetanyahuGavin NewsomAmerican Israel Public Affairs CommitteeThomas Friedman

Related Articles

Trump's Push for Middle East Peace Faces Significant Obstacles

President Trump's unexpected request for Gulf and Arab nations to establish relations with Israel as part of negotiations with Iran has encountered serious challenges. Pakistan, which has been facilitating discussions between the U.S. and Iran, has firmly declined to participate in the Abraham Accords. This rejection highlights the complexities of Middle Eastern diplomacy, as several other nations remain hesitant to engage in normalization efforts. The situation underscores the difficulties in achieving peace in the region, particularly in light of ongoing tensions and differing national interests.

El Paso Representative Discusses Ending Incentives for Data Centers

El Paso City Representative Chris Canales spoke on KTSM+ about the potential cessation of incentives for future data center projects. This discussion follows his earlier support for an incentive agreement for META data centers in 2023. The proposed policy aims to reassess the impact of data centers on the local economy and infrastructure. Canales' shift in stance highlights growing concerns among residents regarding the sustainability and benefits of such projects. The community is encouraged to stay informed about this developing issue.

Iván Cepeda Advocates for Peace and Social Reform in Latin America

In a recent interview with CNN, Colombian politician Iván Cepeda emphasized the need for Latin America to be a region of peace, free from military intervention. Cepeda, a member of the leftist party Pacto Histórico, criticized U.S. drug policies as failures and proposed significant social reforms, including poverty alleviation and agrarian reform. He highlighted the importance of effective dialogues to address challenges in peace processes and expressed support for a national constitutional assembly. Cepeda also rejected the idea of extending presidential terms beyond four years, advocating for democratic transitions instead.

Federal Judge Halts Trump's Controversial Justice Instrumentalization Fund

A federal judge in Virginia has temporarily blocked the Trump administration's plan to establish a nearly $1.8 billion fund aimed at compensating individuals allegedly targeted by government actions. Judge Leonie Brinkema's order prevents any activities related to the fund, including the transfer of money and processing of claims, until a hearing on June 12. This decision comes amid legal challenges from a coalition of critics, including former federal prosecutors and advocacy groups, who argue the fund is unconstitutional. They claim it violates federal laws and lacks transparency, raising concerns about taxpayer money being used for a politically motivated compensation scheme. The judge has requested written legal arguments from the Department of Justice by the upcoming Friday.