Weather

86°F3:14 PM

Politics

1 read

Federal Judge Denies Request to Block UFC Fight at White House

KVIA•Saturday, June 13, 2026 at 12:53 AM•CNN Newsource

Government building representing politics and policy news

Want the full story?

Read the complete article at KVIA

AI Summary

A federal judge has ruled against two Virginia residents who sought to prevent President Trump from hosting a UFC fight at the White House this weekend. The judge, Amit P. Mehta, determined that the plaintiffs lacked legal standing to challenge the event, which is set to take place in the South Lawn and at the Lincoln Memorial. The plaintiffs argued the event violates federal regulations, claiming it is not officially tied to the 250th anniversary of the U.S. but rather celebrates Trump's birthday. The UFC has invested over $60 million in organizing the event, and the judge noted that halting it could cause significant financial harm to many involved, including Trump and the fighters. The fight is anticipated to attract thousands of spectators and is scheduled for this Sunday.

Key Details: • UFC fight scheduled for this Sunday at the White House. • Judge ruled plaintiffs do not have legal standing to block the event. • UFC has spent over $60 million on the event preparations. • Event expected to draw 4,000 guests at the South Lawn and 120,000 at the Ellipse.

trump legal ufc white-house event

People & Organizations

Donald TrumpDepartment of JusticeWhite HouseUFCLincoln MemorialSouth LawnAmit P. Mehta

Related Articles

Key Updates: AI Threats, Political Primaries, and Global Events on June 23

On June 23, significant global developments emerged, including a warning from US intelligence about the imminent threat of AI models capable of launching cyberattacks. This follows the Trump administration's directive to halt foreign access to advanced AI models. Meanwhile, political primaries in New York, Maryland, and Utah are set to test the influence of Mayor Zohran Mamdani and shape the Democratic Party's future. In international news, Vice President JD Vance announced Iran's agreement to allow nuclear monitors, although Iranian officials dispute this claim. Additionally, a shooting in Montreal resulted in two fatalities and raised concerns over targeted attacks against police. These events highlight critical political and security issues that could impact various sectors.

Encuesta revela el descontento de los estadounidenses con la guerra en Irán

Una reciente encuesta de CBS News-YouGov indica que el 78% de los estadounidenses prefiere poner fin a la guerra en Irán, reflejando un descontento generalizado con el conflicto. Aunque algunos apoyan el acuerdo de paz, solo el 22% cree que es más beneficioso para EE.UU. que para Irán. Además, el 69% considera que el acuerdo no detendrá el programa nuclear iraní. La percepción de que la guerra ha sido un fracaso estratégico es fuerte, con un 57% de los encuestados opinando que ha creado más problemas de los que ha resuelto. La administración Trump enfrenta un creciente escepticismo sobre su manejo del conflicto y sus consecuencias económicas.

Trump Calls for Criminal Charges Over Vandalism at Reflecting Pool

President Donald Trump has demanded severe criminal penalties for individuals he accuses of vandalizing the newly renovated Reflecting Pool on the National Mall, which has quickly deteriorated. He warned that destruction of property could lead to up to 10 years in prison. Although no formal charges have been filed yet, the Department of Justice is expected to decide soon on the severity of the charges against those arrested over the weekend. The situation has drawn attention as it coincides with preparations for the upcoming 250th anniversary celebration of the United States. Five individuals have been arrested, and several others have received citations for vandalism, which could escalate to felony charges depending on the extent of the damage.

Trump Administration Ties Federal Security Funds to Election Reforms

The Trump administration is threatening to withhold over $1 billion in federal security funds unless states implement extensive electoral reforms. These reforms include phasing out electronic voting systems in favor of hand-marked paper ballots and verifying voter rolls against a controversial Department of Homeland Security database. If states refuse to comply, they could lose up to 20% of their grant funding, significantly impacting state budgets. This move is seen as part of a broader strategy by the Trump administration to influence state election processes, which may face legal challenges due to constitutional limitations on federal authority over state elections.