Weather

86°F3:14 PM

Politics

1 read

Federal Judge Blocks Trump's Controversial Anti-Weaponization Fund Indefinitely

KVIA•Friday, June 12, 2026 at 3:33 PM•CNN Newsource

Government building representing politics and policy news

Want the full story?

Read the complete article at KVIA

AI Summary

A federal judge has indefinitely blocked President Trump's proposed $1.776 billion anti-weaponization fund, citing concerns over its potential revival. Judge Leonie Brinkema stated that the fund remains a possibility as neither the acting Attorney General nor Trump has definitively rescinded it. The fund, which aims to compensate individuals claiming wrongful prosecution by previous administrations, has faced legal challenges from various groups arguing it violates constitutional laws. Brinkema has given the Justice Department a week to provide a sworn statement confirming the fund's termination. This ruling underscores the ongoing debate surrounding the fund and its implications for taxpayer dollars and the separation of powers.

Key Details: • Judge Brinkema has extended the order blocking the fund indefinitely. • The Justice Department has one week to submit a sworn statement about the fund's status. • The fund was initially blocked due to bipartisan opposition from lawmakers. • Concerns were raised about the fund potentially incentivizing criminal behavior.

trump funding justice-department lawsuit constitutional-law

People & Organizations

Donald TrumpTodd BlancheDemocracy ForwardNational Abortion FederationSkye PerrymanLeonie Brinkema

Related Articles

Federal Judge Halts Controversial Database on Citizenship and Social Security Data

A federal judge has ruled against the Trump administration's plan to establish a centralized database that would have included Social Security numbers and voter citizenship information. District Judge Sparkle Sooknanan, appointed by President Biden, criticized the government's approach, stating that it improperly merged sensitive personal data from various agencies. This decision is significant as it protects the privacy of millions of individuals and prevents potential misuse of their information. The ruling underscores ongoing debates about data privacy and voter information in the U.S.

Supreme Court Allows Exxon to Sue Cuba Over 1960 Property Seizures

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that Exxon Mobil can proceed with a lawsuit against Cuban state-owned oil companies for the confiscation of its properties following Fidel Castro's rise to power in 1960. This decision is significant as it aligns with the Trump administration's tougher stance on Cuba, which includes recent accusations against former Cuban leader Raúl Castro. The ruling could potentially involve hundreds of millions of dollars in compensation for Exxon, stemming from losses certified at nearly $72 million in 1969. The case highlights ongoing tensions between U.S. interests and foreign sovereign immunity laws, as the court navigates complex legal frameworks established by Congress in 1996.

Supreme Court Denies Rastafarian's Appeal Over Forced Haircut in Prison

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled against Damon Landor, a Rastafarian inmate who sued prison officials for cutting his dreadlocks, a decision that may hinder religious rights protections for prisoners. The 6-3 ruling, authored by Justice Neil Gorsuch, stated that Landor could not hold state officials accountable as they were unaware of the federal religious protections under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA). Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson criticized the majority opinion, arguing it leaves prisoners like Landor without recourse for violations of their religious freedoms. This ruling could set a precedent that complicates future claims by inmates regarding their religious rights.

Supreme Court Allows Exxon to Pursue Lawsuit Against Cuba for Seized Assets

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that Exxon Mobil can proceed with a lawsuit against Cuban state-owned oil companies regarding property confiscated during Fidel Castro's regime in 1960. This decision is significant as it aligns with the Trump administration's tough stance on Cuba, which includes recent indictments against former Cuban leaders. Exxon claims losses amounting to nearly $72 million, potentially escalating to hundreds of millions with interest and damages. The ruling highlights the complexities of U.S. laws governing foreign government lawsuits, as the court navigates between the 1996 legislation allowing such suits and existing restrictions on suing foreign nations in U.S. courts. The outcome could impact U.S.-Cuba relations and the broader geopolitical landscape.