Weather

86°F7:04 PM

Politics

1 read

Enriquez and Anchondo Secure Judicial Wins; Runoffs Loom for Others

El Paso Matters•Wednesday, March 4, 2026 at 4:17 AM•Claudia Lorena Silva

Government building representing politics and policy news

Want the full story?

Read the complete article at El Paso Matters

AI Summary

Amanda Enriquez and Chris Anchondo emerged victorious in early voting for El Paso's judicial races, with Enriquez winning the 171st District Court and Anchondo claiming the Democratic nomination for the 120th District Court. However, several races, including the 168th District Court and County Court at Law No. 2, are headed for runoffs due to no candidate achieving the required majority. Enriquez received over 66% of the early vote against Alex Cuellar, while Anchondo secured 65% against Leonard Morales. Key upcoming runoff elections are scheduled for May 26, affecting the judicial landscape in El Paso County as incumbents retire and new candidates prepare to take office.

Key Details: • Runoff elections are set for May 26 for several judicial races. • Enriquez won 66% of the early vote for the 171st District Court. • Anchondo received 65% of the early vote for the 120th District Court. • Candidates in contested races heavily relied on personal loans for campaign funding. • Winners will be seated on January 1, 2027, for a four-year term.

el-paso elections judiciary county-court runoff

People & Organizations

El PasoLeonard MoralesAlex CuellarMarcos LizarragaEunice ReyesChristina MontesSergio SaldivarChris AnchondoBernardo CruzAmanda EnriquezFrances MaldonadoJeffory RagoEnrique Holguin

Related Articles

Key Updates: Voter Roll Changes, Met Gala Highlights, and More

In today's news roundup, significant discussions revolve around voter roll purges led by President Trump, aimed at identifying non-citizens and ineligible voters, which could impact upcoming elections. Meanwhile, the Met Gala is set to attract attention with its blend of fashion and philanthropy, despite controversies surrounding its billionaire sponsorship. Other stories include GameStop's ambitious $56 billion bid to expand its market presence and insights into the benefits of positive thinking on longevity. These developments highlight ongoing societal trends and challenges that affect various communities.

Trump's New Strategy in Strait of Hormuz Raises Tensions with Iran

President Trump has launched 'Project Freedom' to facilitate the passage of ships through the Strait of Hormuz, a critical waterway for global oil transport. This initiative comes amid rising tensions and recent exchanges of fire between US and Iranian forces, jeopardizing a fragile ceasefire. The situation is exacerbated by high gas prices and an upcoming visit to China, which relies heavily on oil from the strait. With 20% of the world's oil passing through this route, the stakes are high for both US and Iranian interests, as negotiations for a peaceful resolution remain uncertain.

Trump's Cuba Remarks Spark Controversy Amid New Sanctions

In a recent speech, Donald Trump made lighthearted comments about potentially taking control of Cuba, which have been interpreted by some media outlets as a serious threat of invasion. While he joked about sending the USS Abraham Lincoln to Cuba, the reality is that no formal military action was announced, and the aircraft carrier is currently engaged in operations in the Arabian Sea. On the same day, the White House introduced new sanctions against Cuba, labeling the Cuban government as a significant threat to U.S. national security. This situation underscores ongoing tensions between the U.S. and Cuba, with implications for both countries as economic conditions worsen in Cuba, exacerbated by the loss of oil supplies from Venezuela.

Democratic Campaign Committee Intervenes in Key Primaries Ahead of Midterms

The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) has stirred controversy by endorsing candidates in several competitive primaries crucial for the upcoming midterm elections. This move reflects the DCCC's determination to influence nominations in battleground districts, despite pushback from local candidates and party members. Notably, the DCCC backed moderate candidates in Maine and California, igniting debates about party leadership's role in local elections. Critics argue that these endorsements undermine grassroots decision-making, with some candidates expressing concerns over the influence of Washington elites. As tensions rise, the DCCC maintains that these endorsements are aimed at supporting candidates who can effectively represent their communities and win elections.