Weather

86°F3:14 PM

Politics

1 read

El Paso Officials Confirm Meta Data Center Deal Cannot Be Canceled

El Paso Matters•Wednesday, June 3, 2026 at 7:15 PM•Diego Mendoza-Moyers

Government building representing politics and policy news

Want the full story?

Read the complete article at El Paso Matters

AI Summary

El Paso city officials have stated that the city cannot cancel its tax break agreement with Meta Platforms, Inc. for a data center project in Northeast El Paso. City Manager Dionne Mack and City Attorney Karla Nieman emphasized that the agreement, approved in December 2023, is legally binding and attempting to terminate it could lead to significant legal challenges. This comes after city Rep. Josh Acevedo proposed a vote to break the contract due to public concerns over environmental impacts and utility costs. The agreement includes an 80% property tax break and requires Meta to invest at least $800 million and hire 50 workers. The data center is expected to begin operations next month.

Key Details: • City Council meeting scheduled for June 9 to discuss the contract. • Meta's project includes an 80% tax break and a $12.5 million infrastructure investment. • Meta plans to invest $10 billion and hire 300 workers for the data center. • El Paso Water will supply up to 1.5 million gallons of water per day for cooling. • El Paso Electric is constructing a $500 million gas plant dedicated to Meta's facility.

city-council environment meta data-center tax-breaks

People & Organizations

El Paso ElectricDionne MackNortheast El PasoRenard JohnsonEl Paso WaterChris CanalesArt FierroOscar LeeserKarla NiemanJosh AcevedoMeta Platforms, Inc.

Related Articles

El Paso City Council Initiates Talks with Meta for Community Benefits Agreement

In a unanimous vote on June 23, the El Paso City Council approved a motion to start negotiating a Community Benefits Agreement with Meta, the tech giant planning to establish a data center in Northeast El Paso. This decision is significant as it aims to ensure community protections associated with the project, potentially impacting local residents and businesses. The council's directive empowers city staff to engage in discussions that could shape the project's benefits for the community. These negotiations are crucial for addressing concerns related to the data center's impact on the area.

U.S. Imposes New Sanctions on Cuban Entities Linked to GAESA

The U.S. Department of State has announced additional sanctions targeting five Cuban entities associated with the government, including members of Raúl Castro's family. These sanctions, implemented by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), aim to cut off revenue sources for the Cuban regime, particularly those linked to the Grupo de Administración Empresarial SA (GAESA). The sanctions include financial institutions and logistics companies that facilitate government operations. Cuban Foreign Minister Bruno Rodríguez condemned these measures as an economic stranglehold on Cuba, asserting that the U.S. seeks to undermine the island's economy amid its ongoing struggles. The sanctions also extend to Annalie Lilliam Rueda Cardero, related to Alejandro Castro Espín, emphasizing the U.S. stance against the Cuban government’s actions.

Trump Claims Iran Made Concessions, But Tehran Strongly Denies It

In the wake of a controversial memorandum favoring Iran, President Trump has asserted that Iran agreed to significant nuclear inspections, a claim that Tehran has categorically denied. Trump's statements, including his declaration of 'infinite' inspections, have raised questions about the credibility of his administration's claims. Iran's Foreign Ministry insists that no new commitments have been made, and existing inspection protocols remain unchanged. The ongoing negotiations have implications for international relations and regional security, particularly concerning the Strait of Hormuz, where Trump has promised toll-free passage, a claim that Iran disputes. As the situation develops, residents should stay informed about potential impacts on U.S.-Iran relations and global oil markets.

Poll Reveals Low Support for Trump's Iran War Among Americans

A recent Reuters/Ipsos poll indicates that only 24% of Americans believe that the military conflict with Iran under President Trump was justified given its costs. This finding highlights a significant public skepticism regarding the war's value and its implications for U.S. foreign policy. The survey reflects broader concerns about military engagements and their impact on national resources and lives. As debates continue about military spending and foreign interventions, this poll may influence future discussions among policymakers and the public.