Weather

93°F8:21 PM

Politics

1 read

Capitol Police Officers Challenge Trump's Controversial Fund in Court

KVIA•Wednesday, May 20, 2026 at 2:25 PM•CNN Newsource

Government building representing politics and policy news

Want the full story?

Read the complete article at KVIA

AI Summary

Two law enforcement officers, Harry Dunn and Daniel Hodges, have filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration to prevent the implementation of a $1.8 billion fund intended for individuals claiming unfair investigations related to the January 6 Capitol attack. The lawsuit argues that the fund could finance violent groups and insurrectionists, violating the 14th Amendment and federal laws. The officers contend that the fund would undermine their efforts to uphold democracy and could lead to further violence against them. They seek a court ruling to block the fund and reverse any payments already made.

Key Details: • Lawsuit filed in federal court by Harry Dunn and Daniel Hodges. • Fund amounting to $1.8 billion is intended for Trump allies claiming unfair treatment. • Claims made that fund could support violent groups like the Proud Boys. • Legal arguments cite violations of the 14th Amendment and federal law. • Officers seek to block fund implementation and reverse payments.

trump law-enforcement violence lawsuit capitol

People & Organizations

Trump administrationJD VanceTodd BlancheWashington, DCUS CapitolCapitol PoliceHarry DunnDaniel HodgesJeff MerkleyMetropolitan Police Department

Related Articles

New Legislation Aims to Support Military Spouses and Child Care Services

Congresswoman Veronica Escobar has proposed the Military Spouse Employment and Child Care Readiness Act to enhance job prospects for military spouses and improve child care services for military families. This legislation seeks to direct the Department of Defense to explore strategies for bolstering the military child care workforce, addressing the challenges faced by families who frequently move due to military assignments. By creating more employment opportunities for spouses, the act aims to provide stability and support to military families, which is crucial given their unique circumstances.

Ucrania nombra a un nuevo comandante militar tras protestas públicas

El presidente ucraniano Volodymyr Zelensky ha designado a Mykhailo Drapatyi, de 43 años, como nuevo comandante supremo, reemplazando a Oleksandr Syrskyi, de 60 años. Esta decisión se produce tras una semana de protestas que reflejan el descontento con la estrategia militar de Syrskyi, quien fue criticado por la alta cantidad de bajas en el ejército ucraniano. Drapatyi, un general más joven con experiencia en el frente, representa un cambio generacional en el liderazgo militar, alineándose mejor con las necesidades actuales del conflicto, que requieren innovación tecnológica y tácticas más modernas. La transición también destaca la creciente presión sobre Zelensky para adaptarse a un entorno de guerra en constante evolución.

Trump Administration Seeks Immunity for Venezuelan Leader Delcy Rodríguez in Court Case

The Trump administration has requested a U.S. court to dismiss civil charges against Delcy Rodríguez, the acting president of Venezuela, citing her immunity as a head of state. This request was made following a letter from the Department of State, which recognized Rodríguez's status since March after the capture of Nicolás Maduro. The Department of Justice filed this suggestion for immunity in a Florida court to avoid significant foreign policy implications. The civil lawsuit, initiated by three American plaintiffs who were detained in Venezuela, also targets Maduro and other officials for alleged human rights violations. A federal judge recently ordered $314 million in damages, but excluded Rodríguez from this ruling.

El Paso's Trash Fee Dispute Faces Setback as Appeals Court Denies Rehearing

The Eighth Court of Appeals has rejected El Paso's request for a rehearing regarding the environmental franchise fee dispute involving former State Representative Joe Pickett. This decision marks a significant development in the ongoing legal battle, which has implications for the city's revenue and environmental initiatives. The court's order, signed on July 20, 2026, emphasizes the complexity of the case and the city's efforts to uphold its fee structure. Residents and stakeholders should stay informed as this situation evolves, as it may affect local environmental funding and services.