Weather

66°F1:57 AM

Crime

1 read

Video Analysis Reveals Federal Officer Disarmed Alex Pretti Before Shooting

KVIA•Sunday, January 25, 2026 at 1:04 AM•CNN Newsource

Scales of justice representing crime and courts news

Want the full story?

Read the complete article at KVIA

AI Summary

A recent CNN video analysis indicates that a federal immigration officer removed a firearm from Alex Pretti just moments before he was fatally shot by police. The footage shows officers struggling to restrain Pretti, during which one officer retrieves a weapon from his waistband. This incident raises significant questions about the actions of law enforcement, as the Department of Homeland Security stated that the officer acted out of fear for his safety. Notably, Pretti was seen holding a cellphone earlier in the encounter, and there is no evidence in the videos that he was armed at the time of the shooting. The situation is under scrutiny as it highlights the complexities of police use of force and the protocols surrounding disarming suspects.

Key Details: • Incident occurred during an attempt to subdue Alex Pretti, age 37. • DHS claims officers acted in self-defense fearing for their lives. • Pretti was believed to be a lawful gun owner with a permit. • Videos show Pretti holding a cellphone, not a weapon, prior to the shooting.

immigration law-enforcement shooting public-safety federal-officer

People & Organizations

Department of Homeland SecurityAlex Pretti

Related Articles

Ecuador Implements Curfew to Combat Rising Crime Amidst Public Concern

In response to escalating violence, Ecuador's President Daniel Noboa has enacted a 15-day curfew from 11 PM to 5 AM in four provinces, including Guayas and El Oro, which are heavily affected by crime. This initiative aims to curb the activities of criminal gangs linked to drug trafficking, following a record of over 9,000 violent deaths in 2025. The government has mobilized police and military forces to enforce the curfew, resulting in 253 arrests within the first 24 hours. Residents express mixed feelings, with some feeling safer while others worry about the temporary nature of the solution and potential impacts on emergency situations. The curfew is part of a broader strategy to enhance security and restore order in these high-crime areas.

Army General's Carelessness and Alcohol Incident Raises Security Concerns

A Pentagon inspector general report revealed that U.S. Army Maj. Gen. Antonio Aguto left a tube containing classified maps on a train bound for Poland for more than 24 hours. This incident occurred while he was overseeing military operations related to Ukraine. Additionally, the report noted that Aguto suffered a concussion after falling due to excessive alcohol consumption during a dinner in Ukraine. These events highlight serious lapses in security and judgment, raising concerns about the handling of sensitive information.

Virginia Man Claims Trump Pardon Should Shield Him from Pipe Bomb Charges

Brian Cole Jr., accused of planting pipe bombs in Washington, D.C., the night before the January 6 Capitol riot, is seeking to have his case dismissed. His defense argues that former President Trump's broad pardon for January 6 rioters should apply to him, as his actions are closely linked to the events of that day. Cole is facing federal charges for transporting and attempting to use explosives, and his lawyers assert that the devices were never capable of detonating. The FBI's investigation connected him to the crime scene through phone data and security footage. Cole maintains his innocence, citing his peaceful lifestyle and autism diagnosis.

Utah Author Kouri Richins Convicted of Murdering Her Husband

Kouri Richins, known for her children's book addressing grief, was found guilty of murdering her husband, Eric Richins, in 2022. The case drew significant attention due to her public persona as an advocate for coping with loss. The conviction highlights the tragic irony of her situation, as she had previously written about the emotional struggles following her husband's death. This ruling marks a pivotal moment in a case that has captivated many, raising questions about the complexities of grief and personal tragedy.